The Executive Director of the Centre for Democratic Development has faulted a statement from the National House of Chiefs in which they backed a ‘No’ vote in the December 17 Referendum.
Prof. Henry KwasiPrempeh said the chiefs are “embarrassingly confused, if not misinformed” about the reason for the referendum.
In their statement, the House of Chiefs said they “strongly object to the notion that membership of local assemblies should exclusively comprise representatives of political parties, as in parliament.
“Prof. Prempeh described this as “a palpably false statement.”
Meanwhile, the House of Chiefs has responded to some dissenters who say the statement does not represent the view of the House as it did not follow due process.
A statement Saturday described the dissenters as ‘dishonest’ and ‘mischievous.’The clause prevents political parties from participating in District Level Elections.
But ahead of Parliament’s amendment of Article 423/1 to change the position of MMDCE’s from an appointed one to elected one, the referendum is being held to allow/prevent political parties field candidates at that level.
The ‘No’ campaigners argue that the division and polarity at the national level must not be extended to the local government.
However, the government and its party, the New Patriotic Party (NPP) who are leading the campaign for Yes say multi-party democracy must be extended to all nooks of the country.
A Yes voter agrees that all elections at the local government level thus Unit Committee members, Assemblymen and MMDCEs should all see political parties participating and a No voter seeks to prevent same.
However, no matter the result from the referendum, MMDCEs can only be elected if MPs complete the process of amending Article 243/1.